Skip to main content

Performance improvements when creating NpgsqlConnection objects

Recently, I applied a patch from Kevin Pullin which will improve the performance of programs using Npgsql. This patch reduces significantly the time to create new NpgsqlConnection objects. This particularly applies in scenarios where you are creating and disposing a lot of NpgsqlConnection objects, like when you are using connection pool, ( you are using it, right? :) ).

Comparison test

I made an artificial test to show the impact of this patch. This test consists of a simple loop where I create 10k NpgsqlConnection objects. 

    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
 
            var connString = "server=127.0.0.1;userid=npgsql_tests;database=npgsql_tests;";
                        
            Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
                        
            for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
            {
                var conn = new NpgsqlConnection(connString);
                
            }
            
            sw.Stop();
                        
            Console.WriteLine(sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
 
            
 
        }
    }


These are the results 

Code without patch:

  • 1st run: 1316 ms
  • 2nd run: 1333 ms
  • 3rd run: 1310 ms
  • Average time: 1319 ms

Code with patch:

  • 1st run: 33 ms
  • 2nd run: 39 ms
  • 3rd run: 33 ms
  • Average time: 35 ms

The new code, on this test, was more than 30 times faster! Of course this doesn't mean your code will be 30 times faster, after all your code doesn't consist of only creating NpgsqlConnection objects, but imagine a high traffic server which receives a lot of requests. When you sum up all the time spent creating NpgsqlConnection objects, this performance gain would make a difference.

 Please, give it a try and let me know how it works for you. Just go to Npgsql git page and press the "Download ZIP" button and get a snapshot of the code. Open the Npgsql2010.sln solution file, build and test! 

Again, thank you very much, Kevin, for your patch!


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Npgsql Tips: Using " in (...)" queries with parameters list and "any" operator

Hi, all! We have received some users questions about how to send a list of values to be used in queries using the "in" operator. Something like: select foo, bar from table where foo in (blah1, blah2, blah3); Npgsql supports array-like parameter values and the first idea to have this working would try to use it directly: NpgsqlCommand command = new NpgsqlCommand("select * from tablee where field_serial in (:parameterlist)", conn); ArrayList l = new ArrayList(); l.Add(5); l.Add(6); command.Parameters.Add(new NpgsqlParameter("parameterlist", NpgsqlDbType.Array | NpgsqlDbType.Integer)); command.Parameters[0].Value = l.ToArray(); NpgsqlDataReader dr = command.ExecuteReader(); but unfortunately this won't work as expected. Npgsql will send a query like this: select * from tablee where field_serial in ((array[5,6])::int4[]) And Postgresql will complain with the followin...
45 comments
Read more

Fixed! LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection

Hi all! Since we implemented connection pool in Npgsql, we received some complaints about EOF log messages being generated on Postgresql logs when using Npgsql. This was caused by Npgsql not sending the proper terminate message to Postgresql on pooled connections when the application terminated or more specifically when the assembly was unloaded. This is a long time problem with Npgsql connection pool. I even talked about it in the past . Up to now, I had no idea about how to fix that as I wasn't able to close the connections in the pool. When I tried to put a finalizer in NpgsqlConnectorPool, which would be triggered when the assembly was unloaded, I received object already disposed exceptions when trying to send something to the stream. That's when I came up with the "excellent" idea of subclassing the networkstream class and override its Dispose method so that I could send the postgresql terminate message before it was disposed! :) It worked like a charm! ...
5 comments
Read more

Using Entity Framework 6 with Npgsql 2.1.0

UPDATE (2014-05-19): Marek Beneš noticed a problem in the default connection factory config. It is fixed now. Thanks, Marek! UPDATE (2014-02-20): I created a new post explaining how to get Npgsql 2.1.0. Although this post is about EF 6, I'd like to talk about our current situation to support both EF 6 and EF4.x which explain why there are some subtle changes between EF 4.x and EF 6.x App.config settings.  Support for EF versions 4.x and 6.x Sometime after we started to work on Npgsql 2.1.0, we started to add code to support EF6 and decided to reorganize our Entity Framework support code. Shay created a pull request to organize this change and isolate the EF code out of core Npgsql code. The result was the creation of two separated assemblies: Npgsql.EntityFramework.dll for EF6 and above; Npgsql.EntityFrameworkLegacy.dll for EF4.x. Only when using Npgsql with EF6 you will need to reference Npgsql.EntityFramework.dll assembly. This is needed because the EF ...
26 comments
Read more